AILA Home
Home
Help
Contact Us
Find a Lawyer
Join AILA
Advanced Search
Recent Postings
Press Room
Press Room
Press Releases and Statements
AILA Leadership Blog
AILA Twitters
AILA Correspondence
Mythbusters!
Public Service Announcements
AILA on the Air
Agencies & Liaison
Agencies & Liaison
Case Liaison Assistance
Processing Time Reports
Department of Health & Human Services
Department of Homeland Security
Department of Justice/EOIR
Department of Labor
Department of State
Social Security Administration/IRS
White House
State Agencies
Other Agencies/Organizations
Federal Agency Contact Information
Cases & Decisions
Cases & Decisions
U.S. Supreme Court
Circuit Courts
District Courts
Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR)
Administrative Appeals Office (AAO)
Board of Alien Labor Certification Appeals (BALCA)
DOL, Other than BALCA
State & Local Tribunals
Practice Advisories
Amicus Briefs
Service Center Adjudications
Legislation & Advocacy
Legislation & Advocacy
News from the Hill
Contact Congress
Legislation & Analysis
AILA on the Issues
Advocacy Made Easy
State/Local Issues
Media Tools
Media Tools
Media Advocacy
Media Liaison Committee
Featured Topics
Featured Topics
AC21 H-1B Portability
AC21 Permanent Portability
Asylum EAD Clock
Backlog Elimination (DOL)
Child Status Protection Act (CSPA)
Comprehensive Immigration Reform (CIR)
Detention Conditions & Policy
EB-2/EB-3 Degree Equivalency
ICE Workplace Enforcement
PERM
Premium Processing
REAL ID
RIR Conversion
Section 245(i)
Section 245(k)
Special Immigrant Juveniles (SIJs)
Special Registration
Unauthorized Practice of Law
Unlawful Presence
Violence Against Women Act (VAWA)
Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative (WHTI)
Practice & Professionalism
Practice & Professionalism
Message Center
Practice Management
Ethics
Mentoring
New Members Division
Pro Bono
Web Resources
Membership
Membership
Join AILA
Membership Benefits
Membership FAQs
Find A Member
my
AILA
AILA Volunteers – A Call to Action!
AILA Anniversaries
Welcome New Members
Conferences & Events
Conferences & Events
Calendar of Events
Annual Conference
In-Person Conferences & Events
Webcasts of In-Person Conferences
Audio/Web Seminars
Podcasts
Conference Recordings
Publications
Publications
AILA Online Bookstore
AILA Book Updates
AILA
Link
Immigration Law Today
The Pulse: AILA’s Capitol Beat
AILA's Immigration This Week
Dispatch
Legal Action Center’s Litigation Clearinghouse Newsletter
Career Center
Products & Services
Products & Services
AILA Online Bookstore
AILA
Link
AILA Association Partners
Vendors
Classifieds
Shop@AILA
Advertise with AILA
About AILA
About AILA
Mission & Goals
AILA Governance
AILA Staff
Chapters
Committees
AILA Interest Groups
AILA Awards
AILA & AIC Announcements
Jobs @ AILA
Immigration Law & You
Immigration Law & You
Immigration Lawyer Search
Help Guides & Links
How and Where to File Complaints Against Notarios and Immigration Consultants
InfoNet Login
User ID
Password
Forgot Password?
InfoNet Registration
Login Assistance
Email This Page
Set Text Size:
S
S
S
Subscribe to Content
Related Resources
Guidelines for Obtaining AILA Amicus Assistance
Home
>
Cases & Decisions
>
Amicus Briefs
Amicus Briefs
2002 - 2000
|
1999 - 1994
AIC and AILA Argue K-2 Visa Holders Do Not "Age Out"
(2681 KB - 11/18/2009)
The Legal Action Center's amicus brief for the Immigration Council and AILA, filed in
In Re Qiyu Zhang
, No. A96-796-201, argues that K-2 visa holders, the offspring of fiancé(e)s of U.S. citizens, may adjust even after turning 21 years of age. If you have a case with this issue, please contact the American Immigration Council's Legal Action Center. AILA Doc. No. 09111862.
American Immigration Council and AILA Argue K-2 Visa Holders Do Not "Age Out"
(2580 KB - 11/9/2009)
The Legal Action Center's amicus brief for the Immigration Council and AILA, filed in
In Re Ting Ting Chi
, No. A96-533-521, argues that K-2 visa holders, the offspring of fiancé(e)s of U.S. citizens, may adjust even after turning 21 years of age. If you have a with this issue, please contact the American Immigration Council's Legal Action Center. AILA Doc. No. 09110968.
AILA Files Amicus Brief With BALCA on Harmless Error
(722 KB - 11/9/2009)
On November 6, 2009, AILA filed an Amicus Brief in an
en banc
review of a recent BALCA decision. The brief urges BALCA to create a harmless error rule in PERM applications. In the
Matter of Hawai’i Pacific University
. AILA Doc. No. 09110965.
AILA Files Amicus Brief on Persecutor Bar to Asylum
(978 KB - 10/22/2009)
On October 21, 2009, AILA filed an Amicus Brief in
Parlak v. Holder
(6th Cir.). The brief urges the court to rehear
Parlak
and modify the section on the persecutor bar to reflect new Supreme Court Case law in
Negusie v. Holder
. AILA Doc. No. 09102220.
AILF Brief Argues
Areguillin
Still Correct
(994 KB - 9/8/2009)
The Legal Action Center’s amicus brief for AILF and AILA, filed in
Matter of Aguilar-Cerda
(BIA), argues that
Matter of Areguillin
, 17 I&N Dec. 308 (BIA 1980), should be reaffirmed and that the respondent was “admitted” when an immigration officer at a port of entry inspected him and allowed his entry, even if he was inadmissible at the time. AILA Doc. No. 09090864.
AILF Urges BIA to Vacate
Matter of Perez-Vargas
(450 KB - 9/8/2009)
AILF’s Legal Action Center filed an amicus brief for AILF and AILA in
Matter of Neto
(oral argument to be held October 1, 2009). The BIA is considering vacating
Matter of Perez-Vargas
, 23 I&N Dec. 829 (BIA 2005). The amicus brief argues that this decision deprives skilled foreign workers in removal proceedings the ability to change jobs under AC21. AILA Doc. No. 09090863.
AILA Amicus Brief Regarding Application of
Nijhawan v. Holder
(55 KB - 8/21/2009)
AILA filed an amicus brief with CA9 in
Kawashima v. Holder
, arguing that the Supreme Court's decision in
Nijhawan v. Holder overturned
the BIA's decision in
Matter of Babaisakov
respecting the type of evidence and procedures IJs can use when an element of the aggravated felony definition may be proven beyond the record of conviction. AILA Doc. No. 09082162.
AILF/AILA Files Amicus Brief In CSPA Class Action
(234 KB - 7/22/2009)
AILF and AILA submitted an amicus brief in support of plaintiffs’ motion for class certification in
Costelo, et al. v. Chertoff, et al.
, No. 08-688 (C.D. CA), in which LPR parents seek to enforce CSPA § 3 on behalf of their “aged-out” children. The brief argues that
Matter of Wang
was wrongly decided by the BIA and is not subject to deference. AILA Doc. No. 09072264.
AILA Amicus Brief Sets Forth Principles Underlying
Brand X
and
Chevron
(269 KB - 7/22/2009)
AILA submitted an amicus brief in
Matter of Gomez-Barajas
before the BIA, addressing
Chevron
deference and the holding in
Brand X
that in limited circumstances, an agency may disagree with a circuit court decision and offer a different interpretation of a statute. AILA Doc. No. 09072260.
AILA Amicus Brief Urges IJ Role in Conditions for Release from Custody
(269 KB - 6/15/2009)
AILA submitted an amicus brief in the Matter of Garcia-Garcia before the BIA. As part of its focus on ICE raids and the expanding detention system, AILA argues that an IJ has the power to modify conditions of electronic monitoring, curfew, and other reporting requirements. AILA urges the adoption of a true alternative to detention program. AILA Doc. No. 09061531.
Guidelines for Obtaining AILA Amicus Assistance
(75 KB - 4/24/2009)
AILA’s Amicus Committee provides guidelines regarding how to obtain amicus assistance from AILA. AILA Doc. No. 09042436.
AILA Amicus Brief Urging Withdrawal of the AG's Decision in
Matter of Silva-Trevino
(302 KB - 12/9/2008)
Amicus brief filed by AILA arguing that the Attorney General’s decision in
Matter of Silva-Trevino
should be withdrawn, as it replaces the categorical and modified categorical approach to determining whether a person has been convicted of a CIMT with an unworkable and fundamentally unfair method of analysis. AILA Doc. No. 08120961.
AILF Files Amicus Brief with Attorney General
(10/9/2008)
The AG signaled that he may eliminate immigrants' long-standing ability to protect their rights and salvage their removal case when former counsel was ineffective. Under severe time restraint, AILF filed an amicus brief reiterating immigrants' constitutional, statutory and regulatory right to protection against ineffective assistance of counsel. AILA Doc. No. 08100972.
AILF Amicus Brief Filed in the Supreme Court in Dada v. Gonzales
(156 KB - 11/19/2007)
The LAC filed an amicus brief in the Supreme Court in the case Dada v. Gonzales, arguing that the filing of a motion to reopen tolls the running of the voluntary departure. AILA Doc. No. 07111961.
AILA Amicus Brief Addresses Post-Filing Worker Availability Issues on RIRs
(12/18/2006)
Amicus brief, prepared by Geoff Forney on behalf of AILA, discusses issues arising from layoffs that occured after the reduction in recruitment labor certification was filed, in cases that are before BALCA for en banc review of a prior three-judge BALCA decision. AILA Doc. No. 06121860.
AILA Files Amicus Brief with AAO on "Affiliated or Related" for H-1B Cap Exemption Purposes
(85 KB - 8/25/2006)
Amicus brief filed by AILA on the issue of what constitutes "affiliated or related" to an institution of higher education for purposes of the AC21 exemption from the H-1B cap. Brief team was headed by Naomi Schorr, and included Crystal Williams, Stephen Yale-Loehr and Geoff Forney. AILA Doc. No. 06082566.
Latest on First PERM Appeal to BALCA
(6/5/2006)
In the first BALCA appeal relating to PERM, DOL filed a reply brief to address issues raised in amici's brief, and amici (AILA and ACIP) filed a brief in reply.
AILA and ACIP File Amicus Brief with BALCA on Issue of Error in Application
(225 KB - 5/9/2006)
Amicus brief, prepared by Josie Gonzalez and others on behalf of AILA and ACIP, with respect to the issues surrounding a PERM application that was denied because of a typographic error in the date of an advertisement. AILA Doc. No. 06050969
Petition for Rehearing En Banc Filed in Ninth Circuit AWO Case
(9/5/2003)
Petitioners in the Ninth Circuit case
Carriche v. Ashcroft
filed a petition for rehearing and rehearing
en banc
. The court had held that the Board of Immigration Appeals affirmance without opinion procedure did not violate Petitioners' due process rights.