Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE
This resource page combines resources for attorneys representing clients before ICE. For information about why AILA is calling for the reduction and phasing out of immigration detention, please see our Featured Issue Page: Immigration Detention and Alternatives to Detention.
Quick Links
- Seeking Stays of Removal
- AILA Practice Pointers and Alerts (continually updated)
- Practice Advisory: Representing Detained Clients in the Virtual Landscape
- Practice Pointer: How to Locate Clients Apprehended by ICE
- Practice Pointer: Preparing for an Order of Supervision Appointment with ICE-ERO
- AILA ICE Liaison Agenda and Meeting Minutes
Communicating with OPLA, ERO, and CROs
The Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA) includes 1300 attorneys who represent the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in immigration removal proceedings before the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR). OPLA litigates all removal cases as well as provides legal counsel to ICE personnel. At present, there are 25 field locations throughout the United States.
Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) manages all aspects of immigration enforcement from arrest, detention, and removal. ERO has 24 field office locations. ERO also manages an “alternative to detention” program that relies almost exclusively on the “Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP)” to monitor individuals in removal proceedings.
Since 2016, ICE has had an Office of Partnership and Engagement (formerly Office of Community Engagement) to be a link between the agency and stakeholders. As part of this office, Community Relations Officers (CROS) are assigned to every field office to work with local stakeholders such as attorneys and nonprofit organizations.
*Headquarters does not provide direct contact numbers or emails for individual employees.* (AILA Liaison Meeting with ICE on April 26, 2023)(AILA Doc. No. 23033004). However, attorneys can contact Chapter Local ICE Liaisons as they may have this information provided to them via local liaison engagement.
- DHS/ICE/OPLA Chief Counsel Contact Information [last updated in 2024, this list no longer appears on ICE.gov as of 1/27/25]
- Contact Information for Local OPLA Offices [last updated in 2024, this information no longer appears on ICE.gov as of 1/27/25]
- ERO Field Offices Contact Information*
- OPE Community Relations Officers
- ICE Check-In Scheduling Website
- ICE Online Change of Address Website
Latest on Enforcement Priorities & Prosecutorial Discretion
Executive Order 14159 (90 FR 8443, 1/29/25) directs DHS to set priorities that protect the public safety and national security interests of the American people, including by ensuring the successful enforcement of final orders of removal, enforcement of the INA and other Federal laws related to the illegal entry and unlawful presence of [noncitizens] in the United States and the enforcement of the purposes of this order. Given the January 25, 2025, confirmation of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, a memorandum detailing enforcement priorities may be issued in the coming weeks.
An unpublished ICE memo from acting ICE Director Caleb Vitello entitled “Interim Guidance: Civil Immigration Enforcement Actions in or near Courthouses” makes reference to targeted noncitizens and includes:
- National security or public safety threats;
- Those with criminal convictions;
- Gang members;
- Those who have been ordered removed from the United States but have failed to depart; and/or
- Those who have re-entered the country illegally after being removed.
Procedures and email inboxes created under the Biden Administration to request Prosecutorial Discretion no longer appear on the ICE website. AILA members are encouraged to review current DOJ regulations entitled “Efficient Case and Docket Management in Immigration Proceedings” for alternative basis for seeking termination or administrative closure.
Access to Counsel
- ERO eFile:
- An online system developed to electronically file G-28s with ERO. Attorneys and accredited representatives may register for ERO eFile accounts and may also sponsor law students and law graduates who work under their supervision. See AILA’s practice alert (AILA Doc. No. 24051506) for more information.
- ICE Attorney Information and Resources Page
- AILA Practice Alert: Updates to the ICE Attorney Information and Resource Page
Filing Administrative Complaints on Behalf of Detained and Formerly Detained Clients
- Online Intake Form for the Detention Ombudsman (myOIDO)
- Available for complaints for issues in ICE and CBP Custody nationwide, including to submit complaints about access to counsel problems on behalf of currently or previously detained clients.
- Online Complaint Form for DHS Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (CRCL)
- Oversight of Immigration Detention: An Overview - May 16, 2022
(provides a list of agencies with which attorneys may file administrative complaints of detention center violations) - Immigration Judge Complaint Toolkit – August 31, 2022
- Practice Alert: Template for CRCL Complaint Regarding Failures to Provide Language Access – July 16, 2021
Selected ICE Policies and Current Status
For comprehensive comparison of current and prior ICE policies, please review the “Immigration Policy Tracker (IPTP).” The IPTP is a project of Professor Lucas Guttentag working with teams of Stanford and Yale law students and leading national immigration experts.
| Pre Jan 20, 2025 Status | Current Status |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Browse the Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE collection
DOJ Notice of Withdrawal of 54 Rulemaking Actions
DOJ notice that it is withdrawing 16 Notices of Proposed Rulemaking, Advance Notices of Proposed Rulemaking, and Supplemental Notices of Proposed Rulemaking; as well as 38 other previously announced regulatory actions. These include 16 EOIR items. (90 FR 43948, 9/11/25.)
BIA Holds That IJs May Pretermit Asylum and Related Applications That Do Not Establish Prima Facie Eligibility
The BIA held that if factual allegations in a claim for asylum, withholding, or CAT protection, viewed in the light most favorable to respondent, do not prove prima facie eligibility for relief or protection, an IJ may pretermit the applications. Matter of H—A—A—V—, 29 I&N Dec. 233 (BIA 2025)
BIA Holds That IJs Lack Authority to Hear Bond Requests or Grant Bond to Noncitizens Present Without Admission
The BIA held that, based on the plain language of INA §235(b)(2)(A), IJs lack authority to hear bond requests or to grant bond to noncitizens who are present in the United States without admission. Matter of Yajure Hurtado, 29 I&N Dec. 216 (BIA 2025)
EOIR Notice of Revision of Notice of Appeal From a Decision of an Immigration Judge
EOIR 30-day notice of revision and request for comments on Form EOIR-26, Notice of Appeal From a Decision of an Immigration Judge. EOIR is revising this form to implement several changes, including filing fee changes enacted under H.R.-1. Comments are due 10/9/25. (90 FR 43477, 9/9/25)
EOIR Notice of Revision of Immigration Practitioner/Organization Complaint Form
EOIR 30-day notice of revision and request for comments on Form EOIR-44, Immigration Practitioner/Organization Complaint Form. EOIR has revised the Privacy Act Notice on the form. Comments are due 10/9/25. (90 FR 43476, 9/9/25)
AILA Recommends a NO vote on H.R. 3486 Stop Illegal Entry Act of 2025
AILA urges a NO vote on H.R. 3486, the Stop Illegal Entry Act, scheduled for a vote in the House on 9/11/25. This bill imposes disproportionately harsh punishments on illegal entry and reentry. Instead of this extreme, costly and ineffective approach, Congress should enact bipartisan solutions.
DHS Notice of Certain Immigration Enforcement-Related Fees Required by HR-1
DHS notice announcing new immigration enforcement-related fees established in HR-1 for certain immigration-related violations. DHS will begin assessing and collecting those fees that are administered by DHS in accordance with HR-1, effective 9/8/25. (90 FR 43223, 9/8/25)
EOIR PM on Procedures for Going Off-the-Record During Immigration Court Proceedings
EOIR Acting Director Sirce E. Owen released a policy memorandum (PM 25-44) providing updated guidance on procedures that Immigration Judges must use when going off-the-record during immigration court proceedings. This PM cancels and replaces OPPM 03-06.
EOIR PM on Consideration of Constitutional Arguments in Agency Adjudications
EOIR Acting Director Sirce E. Owen released a policy memorandum (PM 25-45) providing guidance regarding EOIR adjudicators’ consideration of constitutional arguments during adjudications.
BIA Rules on Relevance of Valid Sponsors and Evidence in Bond Proceedings
The BIA held that the existence of a valid, reliable, and credible sponsor is relevant to a determination of flight risk, and that IJs may consider all relevant and probative evidence to determine if the evidence establishes custody factors. Matter of Dobrotvoskii 29 I&N Dec. 211 (BIA 2025)
CA4 Remands Guyanese Petitioner’s CAT Claim After Finding BIA Ignored Relevant Evidence
The court vacated the denial of petitioner’s Convention Against Torture (CAT) claim, holding that the BIA abused its discretion by ignoring unrebutted evidence that those who share certain traits of petitioner’s faced an increased likelihood of torture in Guyana. (McDougall v. Bondi, 9/5/25)
Attorney General Overrules Matter of A–B– III and Reinstates Matter A–B– I and Matter A–B– II
The Attorney General overruled Matter of A–B– III and, by extension, Matter of A–R–C–G– and any decision issued in reliance on it, and reinstituted the legal standards articulated in Matter A–B– I and Matter A–B– II. Matter of S–S–F–M–, 29 I&N Dec. 207 (A.G. 2025)
AILA Executive Director: Trump Administration Further Erodes Immigration Courts
AILA ED Ben Johnson responded to news that just days after the Trump Administration issued a final rule eliminating the requirement that temporary immigration judges possess knowledge of immigration law, DoD Secretary Hegseth approved using up to 600 military lawyers as temporary immigration judges
Attorney General Refers Matter of S–S–F–M– to Herself for Review
The Attorney General directed the BIA to refer the case to herself for review of its decision, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying opinion, remanded the case to the Board for further proceedings in accordance with her opinion. Matter of S–S–F–M–, 29 I&N Dec. 206 (A.G. 2025)
Attorney General Refers Matter of R–E–R–M– & J–D–R–M– to Herself for Review
The Attorney General directed the BIA to refer the case to herself for review of its decision, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying opinion, remanded the case to the Board for further proceedings. Matter of R–E–R–M– & J–D–R–M–, 29 I&N Dec. 201 (A.G. 2025)
Attorney General Overrules Matter of L–E–A– III and Reinstates Matter of L–E–A– II
The Attorney General overruled Matter of L–E–A– III, and instructed IJs and the BIA to adhere to the holding of Matter of L–E–A– II in all pending and future claims. Matter of R–E–R–M– & J–D–R–M–, 29 I&N Dec. 202 (A.G. 2025)
CA4 Holds That Material-Support Bar Did Not Apply to Petitioner Forced to Cook for Leaders of Terrorist Organization
The court held that the BIA erred in applying the material-support bar to deny the petitioner’s asylum application, finding that petitioner’s cooking was not sufficiently substantial standing alone to help the “Unknown Gunmen” accomplish their terrorist activities. (Ozurumba v. Bondi, 9/2/25)
EOIR to Open Baton Rouge Immigration Court
EOIR announced it will open a new immigration court in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on 10/20/25. EOIR will provide official advance notice to all parties whose cases are reassigned to the Baton Rouge Immigration Court.
CA1 Upholds Cancellation Denial After Finding Petitioner Failed to Show Requisite Hardship to Son Who Had Allergies
The court held that the petitioner had not carried his burden to show that his U.S.-citizen son, who was allergic to pollen, mold, and other substances, would suffer exceptional or extremely unusual hardship upon the petitioner’s removal to Mexico. (Ortiz Trejo v. Bondi, 8/29/25)
EOIR Announces Investiture of Three Appellate Immigration Judges
EOIR announced the investiture of three Appellate Immigration Judges who were sworn in on 8/28/25: Sheila E.Gallow, Marcos Gemoets, and Kathleen K. Volkert. The announcement contains biographical information for each of the new Appellate Immigration Judges.
DOJ Final Rule on Designation of Temporary Immigration Judges
EOIR final rule amending the regulatory requirements for candidates for Temporary Immigration Judge appointment, broadening the candidate pool significantly. The rule is effective 8/28/25. (90 FR 41883, 8/28/25)
BIA Concludes That IJ Erred in Finding Respondent Demonstrated Good Cause for Continuance
The BIA held that an IJ generally should not continue an individual hearing based on a respondent’s speculative assertion that they may be eligible for a new form of relief from removal not previously raised. Matter of J–A–F–S–, 29 I&N Dec. 195 (BIA 2025)
CA1 Upholds Denial of Cancellation and Withholding to Guatemalan Mother with Three U.S.-Citizen Children
The court upheld the BIA’s determination that petitioner failed to show that her U.S.-citizen children would suffer exceptional and extremely unusual hardship upon her removal for purposes of cancellation, and also upheld the denial of withholding of removal. (Lopez Cano v. Bondi, 8/28/25)
Practice Alert: AILA and National Immigration Project Issue Guidance on CHIRLA v. Noem Order
Federal court stays DHS policies targeting previously paroled individuals for expedited removal. AILA and the National Immigration Project issue guidance for attorneys on raising the CHIRLA v. Noem order in expedited removal cases.
Partial stay ordered in CHIRLA v. NOEM
On August 18, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit issued a partial administrative stay of the District Court’s order while it considers the government’s motion for a stay pending appeal.